Fel has specifically asked for feedback and criticism for this particular story.
I have offered one suggestion that more human characters might be needed in order to give them more flavor. At the moment we've only really got one and two-third human characters to go on and military/spy groups which haven't been fleshed out yet.Fel wrote:And I'd like some honest feedback about this one. I tweaked these 3 chapters over and over, and still felt like it wasn't exactly right.
I also couldn't really think of a really good name, so I just went with that.
Anyway, read, consider, critique. And as always, enjoy.
I've made some minor comments about how some of the technology descriptions might have been too specific as they mildly clash with the idea of much further advanced dragon technology over human tech, or seem anachronistic for 2017.
I pointed out that the earth drakes seem to have magic growth with their spikes and seem to be oblivious to it.
I felt mildly confused from the story descriptions as to the general anatomy of the dragons.
And finally, I pointed out two possible traps which may limit the feel of scope and diversity. One that if only the USA are ever mentioned as seeking information on the dragons then you could lose some of the global byplay that gives the story scale. The other is concerning racial stereotyping of the different dragon types where there is a danger of predictable responses without characterization. The two fire dragons working security in the department headquarters are a case in point, currently they are just nameless stooges.
Am I worried about any of these points? Not really, Fel has show himself to be a superior writer many times over. I'm only responding to his request for feedback. I'm not attacking him or this story. Again: I enjoyed it, I hope he continues it, it has great promise, it's already really good.
Fel can and will write what he damn well pleases. I don't expect him to make any significant changes based on what I have to say. Nor have I asked him to, I've just given him some basic impressions in an open forum.
By all means disagree with the points I've made, it's what makes these discussions interesting. There is no attack or demanding going on.